By Brooklyn Reader

February 12, 2016, 2:47 pm

 
Print/Download PDF
Pacific Park

Rendering of one section of Pacific Park Photo: VUW Studio

Brand-new neighborhoods are popping up all around Brooklyn, in areas we know but with names we’ve never heard of before.

No, I’m not talking about the controversial practice by developers of re-naming border areas between neighborhoods in an effort to evade a neighborhood’s “sketchy” past (for example, Bushwick between Flushing and Dekalb avenues renamed East Williamsburg or Bed-Stuy west of Nostrand Ave rebirth as Bedford-Hill).

No, not exactly that.

What I’m referring to is the full-scale carving out of an area within a neighborhood by luxury developers and renaming the area something altogether new.

Take, for example, Pacific Park, the 22-acre, 15-building complex rising over Brooklyn’s Atlantic Rail Yards on Pacific and Vanderbilt avenues near Barclays Center. While under construction, its sign boldly announces itself to passers-by in Prospect Heights as “Pacific Park. The first condominium in Brooklyn’s newest neighborhood.”

Screen Shot 2016-02-12 at 1.06.30 PMWhen Central Brooklyn resident Fritz Celestin first saw the sign Wednesday while on the corner of Atlantic and Vanderbilt avenues in Prospect Park, he was surprised. He snapped a picture and posted it on his Facebook page with the comment, “When developers get cocky: What once took decades to happen, they can now create neighborhoods overnight.”

The comments that followed echoed his dismay.

12714043_10154442545010639_1133714810_nBut is this really a case of cocky developers invading Brooklyn or can this be viewed as, well… nothing new at all?

NYC real estate giant Forest City Ratner Companies owns the property, and for their part, what the area is about to gain is a lot more than it loses in a name: That includes 6,000 more apartments (one-third of them affordable), multiple retail spaces, eight acres of parkland, schools, playgrounds, parking, food courts, office spaces– basically an all-inclusive, self-contained village that blends home, work and play.

Think: Battery Park City in Lower Manhattan or LeFrak City in Queens, both similar-type neighborhood complexes christened with new names and wholly accepted as such.

“Density ought to be embraced, and vertical living ought to be celebrated,” said MaryAnne Gilmartin, president of Forest City Ratner Companies in a New York Post article.

So is it really such a big deal?

Well, according to some residents, it’s not as much about the name of the development itself as it is the annexing of an existing neighborhood to rename it, when it already has a name. It’s what some (read: Spike Lee) have referred to as “The Christopher Columbus Syndrome.”

“All of a sudden, Prospect Heights isn’t good enough?” remarked another commenter on the Facebook thread.

“When you say ‘LeFrak City,’ it’s clear you’re speaking of a development complex,” said Nestor Rodriguez, a Prospect Heights resident. “Ask someone in LeFrak City what neighborhood they’re from and they’ll tell you Corona.”

...On the Pacific Park (www.pacificparkbrooklyn.com) website

…On the Pacific Park website (www.pacificparkbrooklyn.com)

Well, whatever side of the argument you fall on, one thing is for sure in Central Brooklyn: There goes another neighborhood.


Want to write for us? We're looking for interns and experienced writers! Go here for more information.

4 Responses

  1. Akosua Albritton

    Love this story. The neighborhood folks fought against the entire project years ago. The use of eminent domain was misused. Now Pacific Park comes looming up. We knew the hi rise, park & other amenities were part of the plan but to find two years ago it would be an enclave within an enclave–Prospect Heights is the western end of Crown Hts–is too much. Prospect Heights residents are right: why isn’t “Prospect Heights” good enough? When do we reign in all these isms schisms?

    Reply
  2. Norman Oder

    “Think: Battery Park City in Lower Manhattan or LeFrak City in Queens, both similar-type neighborhood complexes christened with new names and wholly accepted as such.”

    Please. Battery Park City is 92 acres landfill from the World Trade Center excavation. They can legitimately claim to be a new neighborhood. It’s more than four times the size, in acres, of Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park.

    LeFrak is built on a vacant 40-acre site, and even the developers claim it’s in the “heart of Corona.”
    http://www.lefrakcity.com/
    It’s a complex or development project, not a neighborhood. Even if it were, it’s nearly twice the size of Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park.

    Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park is a 22-acre site, some pieces acquired via eminent domain and the threat thereof, other pieces (P.C. Richard/Modell’s and most of the railyard) still not owned by the developer.

    Flatbush Avenue cuts through the site at the west end, separating that P.C. Richard/Modell’s plot (aka Site 5) from the block containing the Barclays Center.

    The “neighborhood” includes one 100-foot-wide development site just east of Sixth Avenue between Dean and Pacific streets (B15), but not the rest of that block.

    See map here:
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-DfKe2zMwdvI/VOE22PL9HUI/AAAAAAAAfGk/mVhgZ-v2vW8/s1600/Atlantic%2BYards%3APacific%2BPark%2BMap%3ATimetable%2BAugust%2B2014.jpg

    Does that look like a “neighborhood”? Or is it just a developer’s branding?

    Reply
  3. Bkproper

    Don’t forget Stuyvesant Heights who has distanced itself from Bed-Stuy proper. Using a long suffering narrative, (you know how bad it was back then) they reap the full benefits of our tax dollars while the rest of Bed Stuy can’t even get a decent garbage receptor or a tree planted. In fact, I don’t think the elected reps of whatever is (Bed-Stuy or Stuy Heights) even set foot on the other Bed-Stuy .

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.